itsokgc
01-27 09:31 PM
I recvd a letter from USCIS stating that my EAD which was mailed earlier was returned and they are going to resend it again.
wallpaper and funny comic postcards
eagerr2i
03-06 03:00 PM
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9012355&source=NLT_PM&nlid=8
hl
04-01 10:03 AM
Yay, I get to be .harish for a day!
2011 Nursing FUNNY postcard
green_4545
03-07 10:26 AM
My current title is Software engineer and my company is promoting me to Senior Software Engineer. I am on H1 and have filed I-485 in last July and also have approved I-140. This is just the title change and my duties will be same.
(1) Does my company need to file H1 amendment to keep me on H1 or do I have to necessarily switch to EAD?
(2) Does anything changes with respect to GC process?
(3) Do I need to have any specific paper work from the my company that job duties are same?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
(1) Does my company need to file H1 amendment to keep me on H1 or do I have to necessarily switch to EAD?
(2) Does anything changes with respect to GC process?
(3) Do I need to have any specific paper work from the my company that job duties are same?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
more...
[uber]
04-24 10:16 PM
Cute... 2 stamps///
madmonkey
10-26 03:20 PM
that's absurd - your wife's PD is tied to yours. I was in EB2, switched to EB1 and both my wife's and my 485 were approved together.
more...
coolpal
03-23 07:25 AM
dude.. that attitude might not help you on a public forum where people offer help/suggestions for free... and c'mon, this isn't your english class.. so I guess if you can understand 'ur' is 'your'.. you can get over it.
coming to your point, I see no reason why you can't... only catch is, if you have already used up your 6 years of h1, then the new h1 time is in excess of 6 years, which will be approved for 3 years only if your AOS is pending and your 140 is approved.
pal :)
EDIT: btw, why don't you please update your profile, so it helps IV track uscis behavior.
coming to your point, I see no reason why you can't... only catch is, if you have already used up your 6 years of h1, then the new h1 time is in excess of 6 years, which will be approved for 3 years only if your AOS is pending and your 140 is approved.
pal :)
EDIT: btw, why don't you please update your profile, so it helps IV track uscis behavior.
2010 Battery Funny Postcards by
dallasdude
06-23 03:52 PM
All except NIW eligible
Link please?
Link please?
more...
maddipati1
08-17 03:22 AM
TSC is down and they are using a new system named "CHIMP" to enhance the operations.
:D
good one
:D
good one
hair Sovkitsch funny postcards
st4rguitar
04-06 01:57 PM
Hi,
I am completing my h1 4 years and 7 months..
Planning to apply for GC.....I don't know about PERM processing...
1, How long its taking for PERM processing (including ad etc.,)?
2. Which center is doing PERM faster?
3. will there be any issue if 2 companies file for LC for me in the same center? my current employer is going file LC, but thinking to join some other company.
Please help.
1. To file the PERM itself it is minimum 60 days, though realistically it would be closer to 75-90 days to file. Regarding processing time, it depends on which category, if it is subject to audit, etc. I would say average would be 4-5 months.
2. Chicago hands-down is definitely faster than Atlanta.
3. No.
I am completing my h1 4 years and 7 months..
Planning to apply for GC.....I don't know about PERM processing...
1, How long its taking for PERM processing (including ad etc.,)?
2. Which center is doing PERM faster?
3. will there be any issue if 2 companies file for LC for me in the same center? my current employer is going file LC, but thinking to join some other company.
Please help.
1. To file the PERM itself it is minimum 60 days, though realistically it would be closer to 75-90 days to file. Regarding processing time, it depends on which category, if it is subject to audit, etc. I would say average would be 4-5 months.
2. Chicago hands-down is definitely faster than Atlanta.
3. No.
more...
sampath21
06-25 08:52 AM
Hi All,
Joined California based consulting company in mid 2006, got project in Maryland(MD). Worked in Maryland but CA company ran payroll on CA address. I have LCA for Maryland. End of year,2006 filed tax filing with CA state.
Project went till February,2008 they are running my pay stubs,W2 with CA address. I filed CA tax returns for year 2007 but stayed in Maryland.
Now my questions is I�m present in Maryland(LCA) but pay stubs,W2 are showing CA address. In demographic information form(g-325) which I address I need to use. Should I go with physical address(Maryland) or W2 address(CA).
I have no idea how to go about this, can you please advice how to present my case.
Thanks,
Sampath.
Joined California based consulting company in mid 2006, got project in Maryland(MD). Worked in Maryland but CA company ran payroll on CA address. I have LCA for Maryland. End of year,2006 filed tax filing with CA state.
Project went till February,2008 they are running my pay stubs,W2 with CA address. I filed CA tax returns for year 2007 but stayed in Maryland.
Now my questions is I�m present in Maryland(LCA) but pay stubs,W2 are showing CA address. In demographic information form(g-325) which I address I need to use. Should I go with physical address(Maryland) or W2 address(CA).
I have no idea how to go about this, can you please advice how to present my case.
Thanks,
Sampath.
hot Saucy Postcards
h1techSlave
03-10 12:12 PM
carry police report or some other proof regarding the fire. my papers were stolen and I have always shown them the police report.
more...
house Advertising postcard design
onemorecame
07-18 11:48 AM
I am in a complicated situation...
Approved labor (PD 2003 EB2) from company A (not employed with them). Filed 140 and 485 (self as primary and wife as dependent). Ability to pay RFE on 140 and then denial on 140 and 485. Currently, appealed the decision because needed to get H1 extension and case has reopened. My wife (with company B) had her 140 approved (EB3 with PD 2006) and so after the July bulletin filed for 485 (her as primary and me as dependent) because my case seeemed a little dicy.
So we both have multiple 485's filed (although the first one since the decision is not final on 140 technically they might not have started considering the 485). Read multiple places that legally you can have only one 485 approved but could have multiple 485 pending and withdraw the other once anyone has been approved. Is this true? or you CANNOT even have two 485 pending?What is the best thing for me do do right now?
I have one question that whether you can file 2 I-485 or not?
Approved labor (PD 2003 EB2) from company A (not employed with them). Filed 140 and 485 (self as primary and wife as dependent). Ability to pay RFE on 140 and then denial on 140 and 485. Currently, appealed the decision because needed to get H1 extension and case has reopened. My wife (with company B) had her 140 approved (EB3 with PD 2006) and so after the July bulletin filed for 485 (her as primary and me as dependent) because my case seeemed a little dicy.
So we both have multiple 485's filed (although the first one since the decision is not final on 140 technically they might not have started considering the 485). Read multiple places that legally you can have only one 485 approved but could have multiple 485 pending and withdraw the other once anyone has been approved. Is this true? or you CANNOT even have two 485 pending?What is the best thing for me do do right now?
I have one question that whether you can file 2 I-485 or not?
tattoo Above Ground Funny Postcards
jai007
02-27 11:17 AM
We have filled on July 19th Not yet received the FP notice.
more...
pictures (Funny 1940′s Postcards,
gcwait123
01-29 07:11 PM
I currently have approved EAD, I-140 and waiting for a Visa number to become available. My receipt date for I-485 was July 2nd 2007 and my notice date was September 27th. My employer is closing the IT department in March. Though it has been 180 days since my receipt date, it's not 180 days since my notice date. Will my I-485 processing be impacted when a Visa number becomes available? Also, will it be Ok if I'm out of a job for a short time while I'm looking for my next job? I sincerely appreciate the help and guidance in this matter.
Thanks.
Thanks.
dresses FUNNY postcard
krithi
02-07 03:56 PM
Do we need original copy of 485 receipt when travelling using AP.
Thanks,
Java
Thanks,
Java
more...
makeup Funny postcard
roseball
08-04 04:11 PM
Hi,
I am in the process of moving between jobs. The old job is a teaching job in a university and the new one is a research position in a non-profit think tank. So there is no H1B quota issue for both jobs.
The H1B for the old job won't expire unit next year. I have received the H1B for the new job. The start date for the new H1B is Sept. 1st.
My question is: Can I start my new job before Sept. 1st? I understand that for H1B transfer, one can start the new job once the application receipt from USCIS is received. But in my case, I have already got the new H1B and the start date on that is Sept 1st.
Thanks for your help.
Shan
No, you cannot work for the new employer till Sep 1st as it seems the H1 was filed with a requested start date of Sep 1st and you already got the approval notice.
I am in the process of moving between jobs. The old job is a teaching job in a university and the new one is a research position in a non-profit think tank. So there is no H1B quota issue for both jobs.
The H1B for the old job won't expire unit next year. I have received the H1B for the new job. The start date for the new H1B is Sept. 1st.
My question is: Can I start my new job before Sept. 1st? I understand that for H1B transfer, one can start the new job once the application receipt from USCIS is received. But in my case, I have already got the new H1B and the start date on that is Sept 1st.
Thanks for your help.
Shan
No, you cannot work for the new employer till Sep 1st as it seems the H1 was filed with a requested start date of Sep 1st and you already got the approval notice.
girlfriend found some funny postcards
Blog Feeds
11-01 09:10 AM
According to a recent USCIS guidance an employer may not hire an H-1B worker prior to USCIS approving the H-1B petition unless the employee (i) is currently in H-1B status, or (ii) is the beneficiary of a timely filed H-1B (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) extension of status petition. If the employee is in another nonimmigrant status, such as F-1 (student) or L-1 (intracompany transfer), the employer must wait until USCIS approves the H-1B petition before hiring the foreign worker.
Under section 214(n) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a worker who "was previously issued a visa or otherwise provided [H-1B] nonimmigrant status" is authorized to begin working upon the filing of an H-1B petition by his or her new employer. This provision is often referred to as H-1B portability. Congress passed the law to allow employers to hire H-1B workers without having to wait for the government to adjudicate the H-1B petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html), a process that can often take several months.
The issue was raised to the USCIS Verification Division after employers received nonconfirmations from the E-Verify system when they hired H-1B workers under H-1B portability and the workers were not, at the time of hire, in H-1B status, or were not the beneficiaries of H-1B extension petitions. In the exchange, the USCIS Verification Division stated that the agency does not consider those employees to be work authorized. Please contact our office for further information.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/10/h1b_visa_attorney_guidance_reg.html)
Under section 214(n) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a worker who "was previously issued a visa or otherwise provided [H-1B] nonimmigrant status" is authorized to begin working upon the filing of an H-1B petition by his or her new employer. This provision is often referred to as H-1B portability. Congress passed the law to allow employers to hire H-1B workers without having to wait for the government to adjudicate the H-1B petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html), a process that can often take several months.
The issue was raised to the USCIS Verification Division after employers received nonconfirmations from the E-Verify system when they hired H-1B workers under H-1B portability and the workers were not, at the time of hire, in H-1B status, or were not the beneficiaries of H-1B extension petitions. In the exchange, the USCIS Verification Division stated that the agency does not consider those employees to be work authorized. Please contact our office for further information.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/10/h1b_visa_attorney_guidance_reg.html)
hairstyles This is a funny postcard.
sadshaq12
11-18 05:52 PM
I believe what you need to show is the company's P&L statement with revenue statement, and not just $7000 in profit. if the company has a revenue of $1mil or more, it should be fine, if less then it needs to show how many employees it had and what profit or loss it made....it should be at least $1.0 profit, rather than a loss.
I know company need to show profit and loss
my question was company net income is not enough to meet proffered wages
but if we look at the company NET CURRENT assit from schedule L in tax return
and then pro rate the wage for 7 month ( because company file the LC in JUne)
then company meet the ability to pay
I know company need to show profit and loss
my question was company net income is not enough to meet proffered wages
but if we look at the company NET CURRENT assit from schedule L in tax return
and then pro rate the wage for 7 month ( because company file the LC in JUne)
then company meet the ability to pay
paskal
08-20 03:38 PM
jaime you rock!
please post it on the main thread for "partner to increase attendance"
see url below:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12441&page=9
please post it on the main thread for "partner to increase attendance"
see url below:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12441&page=9
go_guy123
12-22 01:09 PM
Repubs are the only one from whom we can expect support for legals.
Dems didn't do sh%$ in first two years when they had majority in all chambers and now they are trying to make repubs look bad.
Yes true, but IV members need to still call GOP lawmakers, including Lamar Smith.
GOP is the best bet for skilled immigrants.
Dems didn't do sh%$ in first two years when they had majority in all chambers and now they are trying to make repubs look bad.
Yes true, but IV members need to still call GOP lawmakers, including Lamar Smith.
GOP is the best bet for skilled immigrants.
No comments:
Post a Comment