BECsufferer
05-28 02:33 PM
Folks;
Would greatly appreciate your response for following quick inquires;
Q.#11 Dates ... is this the date I signed the I-765 application, or lawyer signed, or the date we mailed or the date USCIS recieved the application?:confused:
Q. #15 Current Immigration Status ... I researched on this forum and concur with those who say AOS.:)
Q.#16 Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ... Selected (c)(9)(). I filed during July-07 under EB2 category. Also this is what was mentioned on my original I-765 application that had been approved last year.:rolleyes:
Would greatly appreciate your response for following quick inquires;
Q.#11 Dates ... is this the date I signed the I-765 application, or lawyer signed, or the date we mailed or the date USCIS recieved the application?:confused:
Q. #15 Current Immigration Status ... I researched on this forum and concur with those who say AOS.:)
Q.#16 Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ... Selected (c)(9)(). I filed during July-07 under EB2 category. Also this is what was mentioned on my original I-765 application that had been approved last year.:rolleyes:
wallpaper Funny/Cute Greyhounds :)
h1b_forever
08-08 07:49 PM
Must read for all EB3
Why should there be a restriction on premium processing ?
You should be eligible.
Moving to the Faster Lane : Changing EB3 to EB2 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eb3to2.html)
Case Study: Upgrade from EB3 to EB2 (http://www.imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-06/case_study_upgrade_from_eb3_to_eb2.html)
Why should there be a restriction on premium processing ?
You should be eligible.
Moving to the Faster Lane : Changing EB3 to EB2 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eb3to2.html)
Case Study: Upgrade from EB3 to EB2 (http://www.imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-06/case_study_upgrade_from_eb3_to_eb2.html)
jaocanada
05-17 10:07 PM
Anyone here who is in the same situation?
I know my PD is in Aug 2006 and was casually checking the I-485 Receipt Notice I got during the July 2007 fiasco. Surprisingly, the "Priority Date" box on the notice is blank.
"Received Date" and "Notice Date" are correct though.
Anyone here in the same situation?
I know my PD is in Aug 2006 and was casually checking the I-485 Receipt Notice I got during the July 2007 fiasco. Surprisingly, the "Priority Date" box on the notice is blank.
"Received Date" and "Notice Date" are correct though.
Anyone here in the same situation?
2011 cute, puppy, zoolander, funny,
gc_on_demand
09-23 07:42 PM
Just read this on another forum.....
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2008/09/menendez-introd.html
Where does that put us considering the house bill didn't even make it to markup today?
I thought it was E-verify and our bill with some sunset bills. Now he excluded those things and added last item which Republicans never supports. So he is making this as suicide bill . This is all about politics. See how they turned back in last minutes. Now they created a image of Immi friendly but eventually they didn't fight for us. Bob was Anti in beginning and he introduce recapture so get our support now after becoming popular among us and our friends , relatives he is officially not stopping bill but killing it.
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2008/09/menendez-introd.html
Where does that put us considering the house bill didn't even make it to markup today?
I thought it was E-verify and our bill with some sunset bills. Now he excluded those things and added last item which Republicans never supports. So he is making this as suicide bill . This is all about politics. See how they turned back in last minutes. Now they created a image of Immi friendly but eventually they didn't fight for us. Bob was Anti in beginning and he introduce recapture so get our support now after becoming popular among us and our friends , relatives he is officially not stopping bill but killing it.
more...
kirupa
03-17 09:46 PM
Hey gaurav - I double checked with a few colleagues, and this is a WPF issue. Unfortunately, there isn't a good workaround at this time. My only suggestion would be to not use those abnormally wide fonts at large text sizes :P
gchopes
10-15 09:55 AM
I just want to confirm that this ruling is still in effect. Use AP to return as Parolee, never used EAD, can continue to work for same employer on approved H1B petition. Are there others in this situation as well?
MurthyDotCom : Effect of Travel While in H1B/L-1 Status with Pending I-485 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_efftrv.html)
MurthyDotCom : Effect of Travel While in H1B/L-1 Status with Pending I-485 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_efftrv.html)
more...
pnc
01-18 11:41 AM
My salary in 2011 has been raised by $20K per annum, from what it was in 2010.
Will this have any consequences on my next H-1B renewal OR if i go for visa stamping OR on the PERM application?
Mine is a small company with just 12 employees and I hold the same position as I used to when i sarted. I just want to know if there would be any issues with this on any stages.
Your replies would be appreciated.
Will this have any consequences on my next H-1B renewal OR if i go for visa stamping OR on the PERM application?
Mine is a small company with just 12 employees and I hold the same position as I used to when i sarted. I just want to know if there would be any issues with this on any stages.
Your replies would be appreciated.
2010 illustration of funny cute
vishwak
08-18 08:24 AM
We still in negotiation. not come to a stage where EAD has been asked for. i am wondering what else could they ask for other than EAD like do they need to provide any proof that they will sponsor my green card or do i need to file AC21 in advance.
It all depends on Company. Most of the companies they just see EAD and take you.
If that company has dedicated IMM people and IMM knowledge they might ask you for more information and they just want to make sure they don't need to support you when needed.
You know it all depends and varies form company to company.
It all depends on Company. Most of the companies they just see EAD and take you.
If that company has dedicated IMM people and IMM knowledge they might ask you for more information and they just want to make sure they don't need to support you when needed.
You know it all depends and varies form company to company.
more...
iv_india
07-22 04:30 PM
Hi All, My question is similar to this question as asked by MSS (Do I need an AC21 filing?). But it's diff in few ways. Here are the details of my case:
I worked with my GC "sponser" (i.e. Ex-employer i.e. A) for exactly a year; then next employer for 4 months; then next employer for 15 months and now I am with my current employer (i.e. B) since 2006.
All this means is that in between I have changed TWO employers and currently with a 3rd employer for more than 2 years. Also it means even though my labor was filed while with employer "A" but I left them even before my labor was approved. I started working with my next employer (other than B) before my labor with A was approved, but my GC process continued with A.
fyi, I am calling my ex-employer who is sponser of GC application as "A" and my current employer as "B". In our discussions, I am not giving any name to in-between employers.
My GC dates have become current with A (It's a 2004, EB2 case).
I have not used my EAD yet with any of the employers and so does my wife. i.e. I am on H1B with current employer. Also I never filed AC21 for any of the employers.
140 approved for more than 5 months (but less than 180 days) and I-485 pending for more than 11 months.
Now here are few questions I have:
1. Do I need to file AC21 or not? and why?
2. How filing/not filing of AC21 can impact my citizenship?
3. Is my pending labor with B an issue for the dis/approval of AC21?
4. After getting GC with A how does it affect my employment/H1B with B?
5. What if I get the GC before I file the AC21?
6. Do you see any issues with portability, in general (keeping in mind that, I already left �A� and the GC is for future employment?)
Thanks much!
I worked with my GC "sponser" (i.e. Ex-employer i.e. A) for exactly a year; then next employer for 4 months; then next employer for 15 months and now I am with my current employer (i.e. B) since 2006.
All this means is that in between I have changed TWO employers and currently with a 3rd employer for more than 2 years. Also it means even though my labor was filed while with employer "A" but I left them even before my labor was approved. I started working with my next employer (other than B) before my labor with A was approved, but my GC process continued with A.
fyi, I am calling my ex-employer who is sponser of GC application as "A" and my current employer as "B". In our discussions, I am not giving any name to in-between employers.
My GC dates have become current with A (It's a 2004, EB2 case).
I have not used my EAD yet with any of the employers and so does my wife. i.e. I am on H1B with current employer. Also I never filed AC21 for any of the employers.
140 approved for more than 5 months (but less than 180 days) and I-485 pending for more than 11 months.
Now here are few questions I have:
1. Do I need to file AC21 or not? and why?
2. How filing/not filing of AC21 can impact my citizenship?
3. Is my pending labor with B an issue for the dis/approval of AC21?
4. After getting GC with A how does it affect my employment/H1B with B?
5. What if I get the GC before I file the AC21?
6. Do you see any issues with portability, in general (keeping in mind that, I already left �A� and the GC is for future employment?)
Thanks much!
hair Funny amp; cute kittens {Part 2}
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
The Senators are coming, the Senators are coming! That's right, the Senate is debating the DHS Appropriations bill right now, and immigration amendments are being offered. I blogged about the Sessions E-Verify proposal yesterday. Well bill, that passed by voice vote this morning, but not before the Senate voted down a proposal from Senator Schumer to table the Sessions proposal. Senator Leahy, in an astute move prior to the vote on Sessions' E-Verify bill, amended that bill to include a permanent extension of the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program. So, Leahy's amendment permanently extending the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program was approved too!
Senator DeMint from South Carolina threw in a bill to mandate the construction of actual fences along 700 miles of the Southern Border, taking away the right of DHS/CBP to decide how best to protect that border. That has also passed.
Senator Hatch has now introduced a bill which includes positive changes including undoing the Widow Penalty, and a religious worker extension and a rural doctors program extension. You can still call the Senate Switchboard to voice your support for this latter bill, and your disgust with the Senate passage of laws without debate that will affect millions of lives and cost billions of dollars. You can reach your Senator by calling 202-224-3121.
All of these amendments, of course, must now go back to a conference committee with the House, and there is no guarantee that any of them will become law. But, lest you thought your time to relax from calling your Congressman was over, it has now started again. Get on the phone and start demanding REAL Immigration Reform, rather than this piecemeal junk.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7232301415393625463?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/senate-is-at-it-again-hold-onto-your.html)
The Senators are coming, the Senators are coming! That's right, the Senate is debating the DHS Appropriations bill right now, and immigration amendments are being offered. I blogged about the Sessions E-Verify proposal yesterday. Well bill, that passed by voice vote this morning, but not before the Senate voted down a proposal from Senator Schumer to table the Sessions proposal. Senator Leahy, in an astute move prior to the vote on Sessions' E-Verify bill, amended that bill to include a permanent extension of the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program. So, Leahy's amendment permanently extending the EB-5 Regional Pilot Program was approved too!
Senator DeMint from South Carolina threw in a bill to mandate the construction of actual fences along 700 miles of the Southern Border, taking away the right of DHS/CBP to decide how best to protect that border. That has also passed.
Senator Hatch has now introduced a bill which includes positive changes including undoing the Widow Penalty, and a religious worker extension and a rural doctors program extension. You can still call the Senate Switchboard to voice your support for this latter bill, and your disgust with the Senate passage of laws without debate that will affect millions of lives and cost billions of dollars. You can reach your Senator by calling 202-224-3121.
All of these amendments, of course, must now go back to a conference committee with the House, and there is no guarantee that any of them will become law. But, lest you thought your time to relax from calling your Congressman was over, it has now started again. Get on the phone and start demanding REAL Immigration Reform, rather than this piecemeal junk.https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7232301415393625463?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/senate-is-at-it-again-hold-onto-your.html)
more...
number30
07-27 04:46 AM
Hi
I lost my job in January and since I was not able to get a new project. So, returned back to India in May'09. My AP was valid till 21-July-2009. I did not file for extension while in US.
Now, I am getting a job in US and the employer is asking if I could join immdiately. Please let me know:
1. If there is any option for me to renew my AP from India?
2. Any other options, since my H1B got expired (6 years) in May'09.
Note: My EAD is valid till June 2010.
Thanks for your help.
You cannot file AP while you are out side US.
You can still apply for seventh yeat extension and go for stamping.
I lost my job in January and since I was not able to get a new project. So, returned back to India in May'09. My AP was valid till 21-July-2009. I did not file for extension while in US.
Now, I am getting a job in US and the employer is asking if I could join immdiately. Please let me know:
1. If there is any option for me to renew my AP from India?
2. Any other options, since my H1B got expired (6 years) in May'09.
Note: My EAD is valid till June 2010.
Thanks for your help.
You cannot file AP while you are out side US.
You can still apply for seventh yeat extension and go for stamping.
hot Funny/Cute Greyhounds :)
dazed
07-19 07:57 AM
I think you are perfectly fine even if you don't apply EAD/AP with I-485. The only caveat, to my knowledge is that you have to wait for I-485 receipt. (correct me if I'm wrong). But based on the number of filings expected, nobody knows when you will get a receipt. Also, I think the I-485s, though filed will still be processed by priority date. The EAD/AP applications will be FIFO. So the more you delay filing them, the more time it will take for USCIS to process your EAD/AP, especially considering the number of filings expected. Based on the processing time for the I-765, which is now more than 90 days and the fact that interim EADs are not issued anymore (see below from USCIS), it is going to interesting to see how USCIS handles this.
Elimination of Interim EADs in Process (sometime in June 2006)
Under current regulations and procedures, persons who apply for EADs can go to the local USCIS offices and obtain interim EADs if the original filing takes 90 days or more. This convenience is likely to be eliminated in the near future due to USCIS concerns over the potential fraudulent use of the interim EADs. The USCIS's view is that the manufacture of EADs should occur at the Service Center level, and the expectation placed on the Service Centers is that they will process the EAD applications and manufacture the EADs within the 90-day processing period.
The USCIS acknowledged that there is a regulation in place providing for interim EADs, but note that this regulation may have to change. It seems that the antiquated machines for producing the interim EADs are going to be scrapped, eliminating the possibility of processing interim EADs at local offices, with or without the required regulatory change.
Elimination of Interim EADs in Process (sometime in June 2006)
Under current regulations and procedures, persons who apply for EADs can go to the local USCIS offices and obtain interim EADs if the original filing takes 90 days or more. This convenience is likely to be eliminated in the near future due to USCIS concerns over the potential fraudulent use of the interim EADs. The USCIS's view is that the manufacture of EADs should occur at the Service Center level, and the expectation placed on the Service Centers is that they will process the EAD applications and manufacture the EADs within the 90-day processing period.
The USCIS acknowledged that there is a regulation in place providing for interim EADs, but note that this regulation may have to change. It seems that the antiquated machines for producing the interim EADs are going to be scrapped, eliminating the possibility of processing interim EADs at local offices, with or without the required regulatory change.
more...
house girlfriend Funny cute cat
sekharreddy
07-18 10:14 PM
Hi
I am applying 485 for me and my wife.My wife got H1 in Oct 2006 but she didnt work until now So she dont have any paystubs.So my attroney suggested to do it on H4 but her H1 is to be collapsed for that she is planning to go canada (not for stamping)and come back so that her H 1 will be collapsed and H4 will be there.I came to know from my friends that canada people are not givng any I 94 for visitors who travle by road.If we request for I 94 they are asking to keep the same I 94 which we have in our respective document.I just want to know how to get the new I 94 for her?
And also Please suggest If there is any way to apply for 485 without cancelling her H1.
Thanks in advance
I am applying 485 for me and my wife.My wife got H1 in Oct 2006 but she didnt work until now So she dont have any paystubs.So my attroney suggested to do it on H4 but her H1 is to be collapsed for that she is planning to go canada (not for stamping)and come back so that her H 1 will be collapsed and H4 will be there.I came to know from my friends that canada people are not givng any I 94 for visitors who travle by road.If we request for I 94 they are asking to keep the same I 94 which we have in our respective document.I just want to know how to get the new I 94 for her?
And also Please suggest If there is any way to apply for 485 without cancelling her H1.
Thanks in advance
tattoo 10 Funny Cute Cat Quotes and
pianojangee
10-11 10:12 PM
I don't think F-1 is dual intent. F-1 is non-immigrant visa. Dual intent means, even though the visa it self is non-immigrant but it has intent to change to immigrant visa, such as H-1B Temporary worker and K-1 Fiance visa.
For more accurate answer, consult an immigration attorney.
For more accurate answer, consult an immigration attorney.
more...
pictures funny/cute/clever caption!
the_jaguar
10-02 12:37 PM
It's taking anywhere between 4 to 6 weeks on an average after the introduction of the new lockbox system. We received our receipts in 29 days, so I don't think you should panic yet :)
dresses Funny cute Panda Tv#39;s for Kids
Hope_GC
03-12 09:52 PM
Great Job Mark.
Incredible, Appreciate your continuing efforts after getting Green Card.
Incredible, Appreciate your continuing efforts after getting Green Card.
more...
makeup funny-cute-kids-wallpapers
h1b6years
04-28 07:08 PM
Assuming you meet the requirements for E visa status as an employee and not an owner of the company, this is a viable strategy.
Thank you for your prompt reply. I'm not the owner of the Company. I just whished I didn't have to leave the Country to get another Visa.
Thank you for your prompt reply. I'm not the owner of the Company. I just whished I didn't have to leave the Country to get another Visa.
girlfriend Funny-Cute-Owls-8
askreddy
01-25 10:54 AM
Hi Gurus,
Any suggestions..
Thanks
Any suggestions..
Thanks
hairstyles Funny cute Elephant Tv#39;s for
pani_6
09-11 05:48 PM
I think this is a step forward...but aint cutting it...your status remains "in process for years"...everyday check the same url and it says gives the same stale status...what we need is a way to make a resonably accurate guess as to when my LC will go into the next stage..
The process and results need to be predictable....!!!
The process and results need to be predictable....!!!
Bobby Digital
October 19th, 2005, 01:54 PM
Does anyone have any suggestions for rain covers for camera's?
Blog Feeds
03-22 12:20 PM
The House voted Sunday night on the Senate bill for health care reform, passing it 219 to 212. President Obama won a historic victory in the struggle for health care reform Sunday as the House of Representatives passed a sweeping bill overhauling the American medical system. What does this mean for Immigration? Big hope for the future, but a lot of work remains to be done.
Tens of thousands of people turned out on Washington's National Mall on Sunday to support the Obama administration in its next big battle, a renewed effort to overhaul U.S. immigration laws.
Speaking by video to the crowd, President Obama said he would do "everything in my power" to get a bipartisan deal within the year.
"You know as well as I do that this won't be easy, and it won't happen overnight," Obama said. "But if we work together across ethnic, state and party lines, we can build a future worthy of our history as a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws."
Though overshadowed by the historic debate on health care taking place in the nearby halls of Congress, Sunday's rally set the stage for a revival of efforts to reshape U.S. immigration law. The issue has been largely sidelined since a similar push by the Bush administration failed in 2007. We do hope that something will change very soon.
Read the CNN article... (http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/21/immigration.rally/index.html?hpt=T2)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/03/immigration_reform_rally_draws.html)
Tens of thousands of people turned out on Washington's National Mall on Sunday to support the Obama administration in its next big battle, a renewed effort to overhaul U.S. immigration laws.
Speaking by video to the crowd, President Obama said he would do "everything in my power" to get a bipartisan deal within the year.
"You know as well as I do that this won't be easy, and it won't happen overnight," Obama said. "But if we work together across ethnic, state and party lines, we can build a future worthy of our history as a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws."
Though overshadowed by the historic debate on health care taking place in the nearby halls of Congress, Sunday's rally set the stage for a revival of efforts to reshape U.S. immigration law. The issue has been largely sidelined since a similar push by the Bush administration failed in 2007. We do hope that something will change very soon.
Read the CNN article... (http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/21/immigration.rally/index.html?hpt=T2)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/03/immigration_reform_rally_draws.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment